Certainly. I'll speak to sex tourism, and if I may, I'd like to defer the other questions to Hiroko.
Particularly relating to sex tourism, I think one of the great things that this House has done is to enact laws that allow for the criminal prosecution of Canadian pedophiles who go abroad to exploit children. There was the Prober Amendment that came in 2002, which removed the provision under which you needed to formally obtain the consent of the foreign attorney general before there could be a prosecution. That loophole has been pulled out, and now the law as it stands I think is quite good. Perhaps the penalities could be looked at and stiffened, but in terms of the laws, resources are being deployed to enforce those laws.
If the Vancouver police hadn't actually tuned in to our Dateline NBC feature that was talking about how we rescued these individuals, and weren't sharp enough on their feet to put two and two together and say, “Oh my goodness. These are the victims that Bakker was violating”, and then cooperated with us and provided the stills--we had this information, but we wouldn't have been able to secure a conviction against him. It was only because we had deployed in these countries that we were able to make that law effective. It's kind of like an emancipation proclamation. It exists, but you have to go out and find those individuals and bring application to be able to set them free. So again, it's not so much a question of the legislation at this point in time; it's a question of deploying the resources to ensure that effective enforcement of those laws that exist can be set up.