I'm not opposed to that, but I do have some concern. I think we haven't heard enough information in order to give a solid recommendation on that, specifically on a national rapporteur. Maybe if that's what we're considering, I think we should indicate in the report that this is an interim report, a first report, and that we are going to do further study.
The motion says that we should consider studying the possibility. Yes, we've gone through a big study, but I think this motion suggests that we need even more study. It recognizes that perhaps we haven't done enough, or else it would have been included already as a recommendation based on a number of witnesses' testimony.
So maybe the first report can be an interim report, with the full intent that we'll be coming forward with more information on this, in addition to the witness I'm talking about—Homes of Hope and Linda Smith. I'm sure the good work she's done will support Ms. Stronach's recommendation. I don't think we can just throw it in there as an add-on; I think it deserves a little more recognition than just adding it as a recommendation at the end. I think we should be having another report come forward.