I think they're much more inclusive. They're not as discriminatory, because they're going to be open to anyone, which is a novelty for this particular department or agency.
The second thing is that I'm always puzzled by the fact that we're talking about transportation for women, or this or that. Those are matters of provincial jurisdiction. Why on earth is the federal Status of Women supposed to be responsible for matters that are provincial? Now, I can see, which was said previously, that it might be a good idea for the federal Status of Women to push the provinces, but you have different agencies in the provinces performing those very jobs. So why do we have a federal Status of Women doing a duplicate job? That always puzzles me.
What I do see in the changes is the advantage that it will be open to all women who have a concern. The second thing we appreciate very much about these changes and the guidelines is that finally it will be used for results. In other words, we find again and again that the money—$11 million—going out every year, a lot of it, is to promote an ideology and to service centres of propaganda, as it were. But they're not helping women directly, many of them. Now, some might, but we find that they're not dealing with women. New guidelines will demand that there be accountability and results. Believe me, that's a great novelty for this particular agency.