That is something we would support. As a matter of fact, we have in our paper that anybody who lives below the so-called low-income cut-off would not pay any taxes at all. Unfortunately, that's not the case today.
As far as income splitting is concerned, the 50-50, it is a fraught with a few dangers. We talk about Canada Pension Plan survivor benefits right now, and it's 60% for the survivor, and it's usually the woman who is the survivor. This is the majority rule again. Even if a husband and wife both have a Canada Pension, the survivor is supposed to get 60%, but they don't get 60%, they get 40% of the 60%. That's one of the things that happen in CPP.
Also, if you talk about splitting 50-50, it sounds very nice; it's very equitable, it's very democratic, and we love it. But what happens if one of the persons dies? Are you left with that 50%, whereas you might have gotten 60% as a survivor?