In terms of the reductions, I think there were some very clear criteria that the government set out to really assess whether or not a particular program should be cut.
You'll recall in the budget the government promised to review all programs to make sure that every taxpayer dollar was spent to achieve results and to provide value for money. The funding was either reduced or eliminated for programs where there were unused funds because of lower take-up of programs or because objectives were achieved through other programs.
The second reason could be if they did not provide good value for money. The third is if those programs could be delivered more efficiently by streamlining or consolidating, and, finally, if they were not meeting the priority of Canadians. So those were essentially the four main criteria that were set out and that really formed the basis of what was brought forward.