I dare say it would. You can't very well argue against any of those points.I think what needs to be understood, though, is that when you talk about affordable housing, it's one thing to have your housing subsidized, but if you're stuck within four walls and there's no one to help you get out and there's no one to share a meal with you, the loneliness and the isolation will destroy your health.
So all of those measures need to somehow take into account the human factor, because if through those income supports that individual is able, then, to purchase in the service that they need, that's terrific, but if they don't really have the capacity to arrange that and organize it, then you still need someone who can do that.
I think that's the gap that is often missed, the fact that we've given you a house and we've given you income, and why is it that you're still sick?