Thank you, Madam Chair. I think Mr. Norlock is going to take a bit of my time as well.
I will just quickly follow up on a couple of items. For the purposes of our committee, perhaps we can do this later, but that labour market partnership agreement is something we should follow up on. It seems to me there was an announcement on that. I wasn't able to get it that quickly, but thank you for that.
I must say that the presentations this afternoon were terrific. You have a story that has been touched on by previous witnesses, but yours is very good indeed—and I'm being particular to Madame Fast and Ms. Diocson.
The story that you gave us today is very compelling. I know we'll have the testimony in the transcript from today's meeting, but will you ultimately be giving us a written brief on your presentation today? What I was hoping is for you to sum up, and perhaps you could do so just very briefly. While this was a very compelling and interesting text that you gave us in your message today, I couldn't really catch exactly what it is that you would like to see.
Madame Diocson, you had some very specific things to say about the live-in care program, for example, and there were some problems with that. What are you looking to see done with that?
Madame Fast, in the same way, on the kinds of issues that are facing caregivers, if you were to come up with two points that you would really like to see, what would they be?
We may run out of time here, but could you just give me thirty seconds each on those, and then we'll go to Mr. Norlock—and I didn't mean to leave you out, but this was very well done.
Thank you.