Does that mean that we won't be able to recover them, or re-read them? We had produced reports but the government had not yet responded to some of them, including the last one.
We will have to read what was said on May 11. I think it was an oversight. We didn't simply want to table them so that the current government could respond and see if it would act on them, but we also wanted to check the progress of our committee.
We have a procedural problem. I think that from now on, our intentions should be worded in straightforward, clear motions and, in my opinion, in view of what I have read in the minutes, we must do more than simply table the reports. That is all well and good, but then what happens to them? Nobody has taken them on, nobody has discussed them here.
A women's group asked me where we were heading and pointed out that the motion was lacking in substance. I had to agree.
I will leave this in your hands, since I don't know what can be done. What it comes down to is a technical irregularity.