I say the most important thing is that it was not scientific, but the correlation was very strong in terms of our in-person consultations. And it is a good way to talk to individual Canadians, recognizing that there are a number of people who don't have access to the technology.
Also, I should mention on that, we also made it available via paper to poverty groups, for example. Women's organizations and poverty groups did use it and transmit it through their own organizations and vehicles. So we did try to do both.