So it's fairly consistent. Okay. Thank you for that.
I have another question. Much of the discussion we've shared and heard from you this morning certainly relates to the measure of income, and income supports, as a measure of the incidence of poverty. I think it's certainly fair to accept that.
If we mine slightly below that line, is there a measure or an incidence at which for seniors, men or women, who may choose to, for example, share living situations or circumstances with other seniors, or friends, or family...? I don't want to suggest for a moment that there shouldn't be the ability for all seniors to live independently. I support what you indicated earlier, that the very best circumstance is for seniors to be able to live at home. But if we look only at income, are we missing a segment of seniors who in fact may have low incomes but truly may not be necessarily in circumstances of abject poverty? Is there a measure here that 240,000-odd folks, yes, are in that low-income category, but by virtue of their chosen living conditions, they aren't in fact experiencing the kind of abject living circumstances that one might conclude otherwise?