I'll answer the first bit very quickly and let John talk about budget impact. I have, what, 20 seconds left now?
Yes, a guaranteed annual income would address a number of things, I think, as long as it's developed so that it understands unpaid work and recognizes that women, even if they're in the workforce full time, still have to look after their children when they come home and on weekends and all of those things. You have to recognize that everybody does this to some extent. The time and the money have to kind of match.
There was an interesting study, and I can't remember who did it, in the United States where they developed a welfare rate system that compensated lone parents for lost time by increasing their welfare money. It was quite creative; I haven't seen anything like that since, and that was quite a while ago.
So yes, the money would answer some of it in terms of a guaranteed annual income. I think there are still probably other elements around unpaid work that you'd have to look at. You mentioned EI, maternity and parental benefits, CPP dropouts, and things like that.
On the budget, John?