I was actually talking of more than that. Tax credits are part of the budget structure, no question, and they need to be evaluated from the point of view of their gender evaluation, but also the overall tax structure, tax system, not just that. There are other tax measures that affect women in our society. In fact, we heard from a number of witnesses, specifically Professor Lahey, who indicated the tax structure itself has certain biases built into it. I think it is worth doing a proper analysis to see. It may not be the case; it may be that it's not as bad as we think, or maybe it actually is biased in other ways and it may benefit some men. I don't know.
But I think it is worthwhile doing. It is important to start from the base to be able to then move forward so that we know what we're dealing with.
As far as the standing committee is concerned, obviously we need to be meeting with the finance department, no question, but with all due respect, I don't think that, as the finance committee did...the finance department has told us before that they did gender-based analysis. We would have no way of judging, and the role of the consultant would be to have an expert to work with us to be able to give us advice and to be able to monitor the extent to which we are doing proper, real, transparent results-based gender budgeting analysis. Finance has hired three people. I don't think it's a difficult thing for us, especially given the complexity of the issue with which we are dealing.