Thank you, Madam Chair.
And thank you to both of our experts this morning. I'm pleased to hear that Mr. Good has a lot of experience at all levels of government. That certainly helps us to ask some questions, and also to Ms. Young.
Dr. Good, you said we need to look at the naming, at what we call the budget—names such as “gender-based”—and that we need to look at other ways, maybe “gender-responsive”. And you mentioned that there has been a gender-based analysis applied to the most recent budgets. You also mentioned that it needs champions.
Where is the real power lever to make sure that a real gender-based analysis—and I'll come to what I mean by that in just a second—is actually being done, and not superficially being done in a sort of okay manner?
To be honest with you, the ones that were done on the previous couple of budgets were not real. Either they were not done properly, or the political decision was made that it didn't matter, that they intended to go forward to favour men anyway. Do you know what I'm saying?
So at what point is that fundamental decision made as to whether a proper gender-based analysis is being done, and who has the power to make sure it is being done? I guess you have said the Prime Minister has, but what would be the structure?