I'm not a constitutional lawyer, so.... But I'm not trying to avoid your point. If I may, I'll use Quebec as an example to illustrate a point I'd made earlier.
With child care, Quebec has chosen a different route: $5 a day and so on and so forth. This goes back to my earlier point that, personally, I think Quebec has recognized that there are some issues around using the tax system to deliver that particular social program or that subsidy. There are other examples through the Quebec tax system where measures that federally in other provinces are driven or delivered from the tax system are actually done more directly.
So without commenting on the division of powers and the resource issue, I see Quebec as an example of a province that actually has thought very carefully about some of the social programs that do have an impact on women. I think the child care example is one of them.