Okay, I'd be happy to go first.
I think the key is the word “transparency”. Dr. Good referred earlier to undertaking this prior to policies being implemented, making it part of the development of policies, making it as natural an analysis as would occur with any program you're talking about, any social or economic program.
The differential impact on women and men needs to be focused on, and the material is there to do that. We certainly have excellent statistical material telling us all kinds of things about the socio-economic status of women. You can basically use that. You take your proposed measures, and do so at all levels, as Dr. Good said. The measures may emerge from a discussion in a think tank, or from a discussion within a political party at a conference, or whatever. But applying that gender analysis at that stage is absolutely key.