Uganda, right.
I have only one question with regard to item D, the gender-based analysis. We did a couple of meetings on that in the last session, and I know that in the 38th Parliament this committee studied the issue at some length. I'm not saying it's not important, but I just wonder whether, in the overall scheme of things, it has the ability to really bring any immediacy or urgency to some of the issues in front of us. In other words, to go back again and hear how the departments are dealing with....
I have to tell you that as a somewhat informed observer, I got the impression, the very distinct impression, from the departments that the notions around accommodating gender considerations in decision-making were very much becoming part of the culture in terms of how programs roll out. That doesn't mean there still isn't some room for improvement, but how are we to weigh the time that we take at committee against how we can actually get specific results?
I know that this is a topic that can consume an awful lot of our time. Would it behoove us maybe to set that aside momentarily? Are there some other topics that we might want to look at pushing more to the front burner? There are some fine topics, and I think time is a consideration. We have Christmas coming up, and then we're into the new year. We likely only have the ability to get a comprehensive report on any one topic between now and, say, the end of March, given that we have other supplementaries and ministers reports.
So if we have one topic and can make one good impact here in terms of what we can do between now and March, let's pick a topic that can actually make a difference for women.