That's why I asked. I want consensus that if we proceed with this, everybody has had an opportunity to read it. So unless they have real, specific questions...and if they have specific questions, they can ask. Is that fair enough? Say, if they wanted to know, “Why did you want to reduce quorum?”, because it has been presented by the government side.
Is that fair enough? Can we proceed that way so that if they have a question, they can ask a question? If they have read it and do not have a question, then we can perhaps vote on it.