Yes, in the sense that, as I mentioned before, we are now doing something called strategic reviews. It's a new process that was launched during this fiscal year. We did it for the first time and then put it into budget 2008. Strategic reviews require organizations—and basically we take a certain number each year—to review all of their spending, and in reviewing their spending they're looking to ensure that it reflects government priorities, that programs are performing well, that sort of thing.
What happens then is this. To the extent to which any of those programs have a gender-based issue that is integrated into the program design, that is certainly then part of the assessment of that program's performance. So we would assess whether or not that program was actually succeeding in whatever it is trying to do in terms of that gender outcome that it's looking to generate.
There is a means. That is the tool we currently have. There is a host of other issues, of course, that goes into the strategic review: official languages, legal and contractual obligations, the impact on HR, federal-territorial relations. There are all kinds of issues that go into a strategic review, but certainly if there are gender-based impacts, those are taken into account and are put into that mix as well.