I'll let Mr. Wild talk to you in terms of the policy. There is the overall policy on evaluation, and it's up to departments, of course. Departments are responsible for undertaking program evaluations, but as I said, it's a matter of looking at program effectiveness and impacts and whether programs are having a negative impact. That's how you build new policies, come in with new proposals to modify programs with a new policy initiative, and inform that process through robust program evaluations.
On the issue of private member's bills, they are initiated by members of Parliament in the House, so I can't tell you whether members of Parliament, in their development of private member's bills, have actually undertaken a gender-based analysis themselves for initiatives coming forward.
Regarding the timing of these things, if something is moving forward and if it becomes policy, then it becomes after-the-fact if something is approved in terms of assessing the implications. I guess the extent to which officials are in a position to do some kind of assessment of what the impacts would be from a gender point of view, after the fact.... You would have to turn that question to members of Parliament, on the extent to which they do gender-based analysis on their proposals.