Yes.
Just bear with me. I think I'm trying to get to the bottom of how we as a committee hear these things from structural people whom we are counting on.
We know that when we speak to advocative groups that come in, they give a different picture; we understand that. But I'm trying to ask, is the problem within Status of Women the fact that perhaps it's not high enough in the ministerial rank? Is it because, when you consider the finance department and the massive resources it has and the minuscule resources Status of Women has, that it actually can't do the job, that it doesn't have the resources to do the proper GBA?
We as a committee are going to have to depend on them long after you're gone, and if we're getting one bit of information from them and getting a totally different thing from you, and yet they're supposed to be champions....
I would like to hear your comments on this, because it has been frustrating.