Can I just point to the front page of the thing that I submitted to you last year, Bruce--March 28, 2008, correctly? The list is very short: affordable housing, post-secondary education, child care, health-related services, public transit, social services, training and employment services, legal aid, and support for caregivers. It's the known list. Do anything on those areas and you'll improve lives for women. It is not gender specific, it is gender friendly to actually make progress on these things.
On the income side, the very point that you raise about a woman earning $1,000 being treated the same as a man earning $100,000 is right on. The distributional issue is huge. So my third point in my presentation to you is this. Ask Finance always to break it down by income class. Who are the beneficiaries, male and female, by income class? That information is easily accessible. They have it all and they can estimate it. Then you can see if we are actually spending most of our tax cuts on the people who need the help least. If we still want to spend that much money on relieving the tax burden, can we reallocate it so that it's going more to the people who need more help?