I can briefly respond to that.
Other countries that started out when Canada was number one in the mid-1990s and the second half of the 1990s are still there, because they are still doing what they were doing then, and they are working very diligently to try to close the gap even further.
To take an example of some of the strategies that Scandinavian countries are using to try to close their gender gaps even more fully, they're now looking at ways to give men incentives to take parental leave, because they perceive that the quality of all people's lives will improve if more parental time—by both mother and father, or whatever the household configuration is—is given to people to be with their children. They're now getting to the point where they're aiming incentives not just at women, but also at men.
There are some countries that have outstripped Canada now on all of the indicators, because even though they're at a lower level of development, they have higher on-the-ground gender equality, beginning with the numbers of women sitting in their parliaments; the numbers of women involved in running corporations and important government departments; and income distribution; and ownership of productive assets. So it's a combination of Canada quitting doing a lot of the things that got it where it was, and.... There's no question about that.
How Canada got where it was has become really common knowledge; these are not secrets anymore. Other countries that put a really minimal amount of effort into systematically pursuing a gender-aware analysis and in doing gender budgeting are outstripping Canada. Either way, this will beat Canada.
I predict that with these current budgetary allocations, Canada is going to slip even further in the indicators.