I think I can be very brief in answering those questions and say that no one knows.
To expand slightly with regard to buy-in, it comes and goes. This is what I mean by one of the challenges we face in terms of responding to political change. Some of our political champions, and our previous first minister, have bought in. As we know, first ministers and justice ministers and equality ministers and the makeup of committees come and go. But through the activities of Scottish Women’s Budget Group, as Angela said, we continue to ensure that there's buy-in across the policy-making community. If that means saying the same thing over and over and over again, we're quite happy to do that—well, maybe “happy” is too strong a word.
On your second point, the gender disaggregated data, we don't have sufficient gender disaggregated data in place yet. But that's not a reason to say we can't do this. We regularly come across that as a reason, saying we can't do gender budget analysis because we don't have the required data to do the analysis. That in itself is doing gender budget analysis: discovering where you don't have the data, the gaps in the data, and to go about collecting them for the next budget round. I don't think it's sufficient to say we don't have the data, therefore we can't start. We start by saying we don't have the data, so let's collect it, and let's ensure we fill those gaps.