One of the interesting things in San Francisco was that when the board of supervisors passed their resolution in 2003 requiring governments to put together the impact of the budget cuts on their services, there were no sanctions. So one of the questions, to me, has always been, what kinds of sanctions should there be? It's almost like when you have a government in the United States that's using all sorts of performance measures and doesn't tie those performance measures to any kind of budget allocations.
But there has always been hesitation to do that, about what kinds of sanctions you place, how strong those sanctions should be, and whether those sanctions should be tied to your future budget allocation. I think that's a very serious issue to be undertaken.