Well, I noticed that in the responses you had from witnesses, one of the things you asked--I think it was the Treasury Board, or it might have been the Privy Council--was this. Treasury Board said they were challenging departments when they didn't do their submissions with agenda perspectives, when they didn't use GBA, but you didn't know which departments. In our system the cloak of cabinet confidentiality can be thrown very wide, so sometimes there is no transparency in terms of what is happening with which department and whether people really are adhering to the rules. That's another reason that another level of oversight can be very, very valuable.
At the moment the role for Status of Women is a bit grey. You can't be a petitioner, the judge, the jury, and the executioner, and in many ways we're asking Status of Women to do all that. Again, a legislative framework would really help to clarify a lot of the roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities.