They did? And they said it really emanated from the top, and then went back down to the minister responsible to push it through the system. The decision was made cabinet level, and then it went back down. So it may have come up at some point, but the push was really from the top to have legislation and to have a requirement right through the British civil service, which was quite an amazing turnaround, because Canada had been so far ahead of Britain--in fact, so far ahead of everybody. We really have lost ground.
In Bangladesh, they're trying to do gender budgeting, and it's been with CIDA and DFID British aid assistance. We have a project there on policy leadership and advocacy for gender equality. We've made a lot of strides in being able to get the idea across. They've been very keen, because they've been able to track. They have a lot of women-focused spending, so they feel very good about being able to do that. Now the technical backup is being given to try to get them to understand that you have to disaggregate the whole budget, and you have to disaggregate your policies and allocations to the various activities.
So a lot of people are doing a lot of work, but I don't think it's really come as far as it should. It's all dependent on the quality of your gender-based analysis. If you don't have that, you can't make that leap into doing any analysis of the budget, and you can't compel the technical understanding or involvement of your bureaucrats. That's your first step.
I think we've come quite far now on that, really trying to push that.