Thank you very much, and thank you to the five of you for coming here this morning.
Ms. Dryburgh, you just gave a good example with the HRSDC statistic, which pre-empted a little bit of the question I was going to ask Ms. Regehr.
Ms. Regehr, in your comments--I think I took it down correctly--you said that traditional poverty indicators don't capture women's reality. You just gave an example of women's reality not being captured.
I have here the indicators on women in poverty. What else could be and should be done to accurately reflect women's reality, whether it's related to poverty or related to retirement, which could also have a poverty aspect? How do we get that texture in the statistics?
I have an added comment. Ms. Regehr, you talked about the different languages in the not-for-profit, government, and whatever sectors. I'm certainly hearing here this morning that there are very different realities and languages reflected by the organizations that are presenting. So how do we capture the reality?