Is this in response to what I stated, that from 2002-03 onwards, the budget--actually that's what the estimates show--was $24 million? Then the minister made a statement in 2006. The budget went down to $10 million, so there's a $14 million shortfall. I don't want to get into mathematical confusion here, and I would like the committee to proceed with their questions. Perhaps I could take it aside and understand what the issue is.
On April 29th, 2008. See this statement in context.