It's partly a question and partly a comment.
We've heard a lot of discussion about how much your office costs and how many full-time employees there are. You mentioned a time in 1995 when the Office of the Commissioner pushed back because of budget cuts and that sort of undermining or possibly undermining of the position. So ultimately it would seem to me that we have to have a balance, and certainly we can't have runaway institutions, but on the other hand, we also have to make absolutely sure we have this oversight, this vigilance in terms of ensuring the effectiveness of our democracy.
Would it be safe to say that Parliament must always be vigilant to make sure you have that independence that you need, that we have this oversight, and that while we may talk about the cost of doing things, there's a cost of not doing them?