I appreciate the attempt to put this, and I think it's the right approach given that the first motion is not in order. I would have some concerns around taking one section of that bill and putting that in the frame. Really what's at issue here is the content of the bill. To sort of single out one—I mean, there are a host of issues that are raised in here particularly as they relate to injury to women, which is ultimately what the bill deals with. It really is ultimately about more strict penalties for those who perpetrate such crimes.
I think I would be more comfortable with seeing a general statement there as opposed to taking a specific phrase out of the language, because the bill is certainly more encompassing than just the injury to the unborn.