I probably pre-empted your question a little, but I thought we were running out of time.
We have had some gains in terms of protecting access to third-party records in sexual violence cases. We now find that there are cases coming up through the system in which defendants are challenging and wanting very broad, very unrestrained access to third-party records. That would take us right back to where we were in the 1980s, before we had all of these gains. That's a lot of money spent for not very much.
We could stop those cases now. We could provide the court with effective information to make a reasoned and balanced decision, to have a full and fair hearing, but we're prevented from doing so. There are cases that are very difficult to access. There are cases that are very difficult to research. We can't keep tabs on them all, and very slowly, piece by piece, they're eroding those gains that are so important for protecting anyone who is a victim of violence. That would be one area.
I think another area we're starting to see in Canada is the impact of things like third-country agreements and the position of agricultural workers. All of those are cases in which we are being restricted in our ability to give the court the information it needs to make an authoritative decision.