Okay.
I'm trying to make clear what the original question was.
As I understand, the question you would like to have answered is what some of the cases are that would remain unfulfilled as a result of the de-funding of the court challenges program, and that's an excellent question.
I think we have talked about a few. Obviously, Ms. McIvor has given very powerful evidence about one of the most important cases that's working its way up. Other areas I've alluded to are the cases that are coming up through the criminal bar. Also, Elizabeth Atcheson made clear that there's a problem here, because in a case like that the defence and the prosecutor are really focused on their particular case. What they're doing is actually unintentionally eroding some of the very important charter gains that have been made around the protection of privacy of Canadians, the protection for women against harmful effects of stereotypes. They don't intend that to happen, but the cases are coming up, and somebody needs to be at the court to say, “Hang on, you don't actually see what's happening here. Here's the evidence to the court. We have the expertise and we can provide it.” Because we don't have funding, we can't get access to those cases. And when we do find out about them, we don't have the money to launch a challenge.
Those are some examples.