I think the point should be made that in nearly all the cases she has cited, the majority of women did not approve of the decisions. REAL Women intervened in many of those cases, and we represent mainstream Canadian women. Because they got funding, they were able to argue their own narrow, radical feminist agenda.
For example, there is employment equity. Most women do not support it. We like equal pay for equal work, but not equal pay for work of equal value. We do not agree with the Ewanchuk decision. For example, she cited the rape cases. We do not agree. So who are they to get funding to represent a special interest group only?