Thank you.
I'd still like to make some comments. I came before that motion was withdrawn, and I heard your reasoning, Chair, regarding the fact that it's a church matter and that it might not be appropriate for the committee to deal with this. I do agree with you, so I thank you for your comments.
The other part I want to mention, though, in case the motion comes back yet again--to be honest, Chair, I was at the last meeting because I wanted to participate in this debate, and Madam Demers withdrew her motion, so I was surprised when it was tabled again--is that it is a factually incorrect motion. There are statements of fact here that are absolutely incorrect.
I think it's fair to point that out, because it is doing no justice to the Catholic Church and to the Vatican to leave the impression that the only reason the committee is not dealing with this motion is because it's a matter of church. It's factually incorrect. The nine-year-old girl was never excommunicated, and certainly never by the Vatican. That's very clear. Canon law is very clear. At the age of nine years old, she does not have full--