Thank you, Madam Chair.
With regard to the comment about not documenting the challenge function if it was working so well, I would just point out that there is a table in the chapter that identifies that 13 out of 28 cabinet submissions did include gender-based analysis. Of the 15 that did not, for 10 of those we found evidence that gender-based analysis was done. If it was done and the challenge function was functioning properly, it should have been one of the ones that would have caught that and put it into the cabinet submission.
I think there is some opportunity for improvement in the process. If it's not documentation, it has to be something else that would work in that regard.