No. We looked to see that the analysis was done and was considered. It does not mean that if the analysis was done and it said, for example--take a worst-case scenario--that this could negatively impact women that it would be the overriding consideration. There are a number of other factors that come into account in determining policy. But it is important, and government has made a commitment, that this would be considered. We can equate it to environmental issues and to a lot of other considerations that need to come into play in developing policy.
What we wanted to see was that the analysis had been done. Government made a commitment that it would do this. We wanted to see that the analysis had been done and that there had been some consideration given to it in policy development. It doesn't mean that it was the overriding factor, and it could have been completely put aside. We just wanted to see that it was done.
You will see, in the chart on page 16 of the English version, that we were only able to see evidence in four cases out of 68 that it was done and integrated into policy options--not necessarily into the final policy itself, but considered in the policy development.