I think we're on the same wavelength. I think we know the needs are there. I don't understand Ms. Hoeppner's reaction, though, because for me the intent is the same, because both motions support first nations women living on reserve. That's the intent--to support them. Mrs. Neville's motion actually brings a concrete action for how we can support them. So I don't understand.
On June 4th, 2009. See this statement in context.