My reasons are the same as last time, namely that the committee must have access to all of the documents that the Auditor General was not able to consult.
At our last meeting, my colleague Ms. Demers pointed out that in the next-to-last line of the English version, the following is noted:
“that the Auditor General of Canada used or may have been...”.
The motion should have read “could have been“, instead of “may have been“.