Thank you very much, Mr. Desnoyers. I shall answer in English because I am a little faster in English.
With the statistics that we used from the current public service, the statistics related to women who currently work for the public service, those statistics actually come from the most recent public service employee survey that was conducted by Treasury Board Secretariat on behalf of Treasury Board and other core administration employers. I believe it was done last year, in 2008, so that's where the statistics from the public service that are public service-specific come from.
I believe your next question was with respect to accommodation of women in broader trades and whether there was sufficient accommodation for them to fully participate in non-traditional work. Is that correct?
I don't actually believe that there's significant or meaningful accommodation of women and family status for women to fully participate economically in Canada, period. I do speak from a pan-Canadian perspective. While I recognize that Quebec has the best child care program in Canada--or at least I would suggest that it does--I recognize that there are problems for part-time workers, students, and shift workers who live and work in Quebec. There's also the whole issue of space availability for children.
For women across the rest of Canada, I would suggest that our failure to deal with the issues related to child care and eldercare definitely has a huge impact on women's ability to fully participate economically in the country.
On the question of aboriginal women, were you asking about the statistics or...?