But my colleague has the data. Just generally speaking, in the RRSPs there's a significant amount of room that's not used. Generally speaking, the amount of room that's not used is at the lower income levels and, generally speaking, that of course could be because individuals who have lower incomes don't have as much access to savings, but also a contributing factor to that could be the fact that GIS is available. So there are measures for low-income individuals, and a lot of the retirement income necessary for those individuals is available through other means. So you tend to see that the savings take-up is not as high and it is difficult to say specifically what the reason for that is.
But generally speaking, do you want to give the information on the total take-up, the amount of unused room, proportionally?