The idea of a guaranteed annual income, as you know, is not new; it's been around for decades. We believe it is one way of ensuring that we don't ensure the deprivation of people in our society. We have lived with poverty from the beginning. I would argue that in today's society, it's not easy to look at the face of poverty when you walk down the street. You see children who go to school hungry; you see older people living on the streets. The guaranteed annual income would give a level of security that would allow us to ensure that people aren't living in deprivation. You would meet the determinants of health, so you'd have a healthier population, more like what you would find in the Scandinavian countries.
The other question slipped my mind; I apologize. What was the second one?