Whether you agree with the one that was passed.... I don't know what is so difficult on this issue.
We're saying let us commemorate a law that was passed, Bill C-68; on December 5, 1995, it became law. All right. People are suggesting that that day and that thing be commemorated, that that event be commemorated. Now, in order to do so, you may say, well, I can't commemorate it because I don't agree with it; I didn't think it was a good thing in those days and I didn't like that law. But we couldn't move now into another bill that is on the table. We're speaking to this. You may say, I do not wish to do this because I did not agree with that law then and I don't want to commemorate something that I don't agree with. This is what we're discussing. So you have to mention that particular law, Bill C-68, that was passed on December 5.
But we're not discussing further laws that are on the table. That is where Ms. Hoeppner was straying a little bit, and I think that Ms. Zarac made that point.
So I think it's pretty simple, if everyone were to listen and try to understand what we're moving here, because we're trying to do a balancing act here. It's my job as the chair, whether people like it or not, to move you back to what we're discussing, back to the balancing act that we're doing, and not to allow us to tangentially go into other areas.
Thank you.