Thank you. I think there are several answers to your question, and I'm sure my colleagues will be happy to contribute as well.
First of all, I think the reason there has been much more attention paid to child health is that it is actually easier to save lives quickly through immunization-type programs and treatments of diarrhea, and those kinds of vertical programs, we might call them. It's much easier to do that and to get good results quickly than it is to build a public health system. Emergency obstetric newborn care, or skilled birth attendants, primary care, all of that, but particularly the emergency obstetric newborn care, is the cornerstone of building a public health system.
So I think what you have seen is that even in fragile countries, in terms of their economic state, their health systems, or lack of them, they have been able to be supported to provide significant advantages or advances in terms of child health, and it has been more challenging to provide the advances on the maternal side.
We know that decision-making is often not with the woman and that this is a factor in terms of her being able to access care, both with respect to the decision made in the first place and the finances related to being able to fund that care once it has been sought, which is why there has been a significant push and an uptake from committed countries to either provide free access at point of care for mothers and young children, or a coupon-type system.