It can create difficulties. When I was working in Guyana, for example, during the Bush gag order, we were working on HIV and AIDS and STD programming on behalf of the Canadian government, but we were also trying to figure out who was doing what and what were they doing, and the extent to which they were doing it, etc. It was difficult for some of the donors, like USAID and the PEPFAR groups. But then there were a lot of other bilateral organizations, mostly faith-based organizations, that were in Guyana as well doing HIV work, and it was very difficult to control the quality, the training, the protocols, the guidelines, the standards, etc., when we weren't all speaking from the same book.
With regard to WHO, you're correct, there is an agenda item on the World Health Assembly agenda with regard to the progress of the MDGs. Canada as a member country will be there, and it won't necessarily be addressing it but will be part of the commitment to the MDGs. Everybody's assumed that we have committed to those, and the assumption would be that they would be consistent with their previous commitments at the World Health Assembly with regard to the MDGs. Whether that's consistent with what happens at the G-8 is a reasonable question.