I would say it is prevention. You named a number of programs and initiatives that have been implemented. Often money is given to the communities and things do get done. Everything happening in the communities is not necessarily negative.
One example would be community healing. The Aboriginal Healing Foundation was funding a program. I want to talk about this, because it has funded a number of projects for more than three years, all across the country. They are yielding good results. You just drew a comparison with the G20. That program was cut on March 31 of this year.
Certain expectations were created. Services were made available in the communities and, from one day to the next, they found themselves with no more funding.
There are other examples that could be mentioned, but there is the whole matter of priorities in the communities. We talked about this. Communities are all independent, in a way, in terms of identifying the issues and so on. If it's not a priority for the community, money won't be invested in these different areas.
People often talk about large amounts of money being provided, but by the time it gets down to us, there is less money there. It's true that there are budgets of $285 million or $200 million, but at the bottom of the ladder what is left is just $18,000 for prevention.
At the same time, there is the matter of intervention and development. I come back to what Ms. Archambault said. Money has to be invested across the board and we need our own institutions. We talked about the fact that this is necessary for a number of reasons, including language problems and the cumbersome legal system. In closing, I would just like to say that, in a way, our communities are also prisons.