The motion does not carry.
All right. Now we have another motion.
The other motion is from Ms. Neville and reads:
That the Standing Committee on the Status of Women unanimously endorse the initiative by Equal Voice to elevate the tone of the debate in the House of Commons on October 19, 2010, in order to attract and retain more women in politics and better showcase the good work that is being done; and that this endorsement be reported to the House as soon as possible.
So this is obviously not a study; this is merely an endorsement.
Ms. Neville, if you don't mind my noting a grammatical piece here, how it reads is to elevate the tone of the debate in the House on that one day. I think you may want to take out October 19, 2010, and put it at the end: “endorse the initiative by Equal Voice on October 19, 2010”. Is that all right? It was basically just that grammatical change.