I hope I understand your question correctly. What I was aiming at in my appearance on June 16 was that there is significant value in answering that we deal with pay equity issues in a proactive manner; I also said that there were some very good results that came out of those provincial models to which you referred. I also said, though, that none of them was very specific on how to maintain it.
To answer your question, I would say that the process by which we determine that equal pay for work of equal value has been achieved can be married to the process by which we determine wages. Not only can they be married, but the underpinning of the equitable compensation act is that they should be married to make sure that the analysis occurs at the time of setting wages and that issues are addressed at that point in time.
It goes further than the provincial legislation, because it also provides for an obligation to maintain pay equity in the same way. Whenever you review wages, you actually have to re-address, if need be, any equitable compensation issues that may have arisen.