Thank you. That sheds a great deal of light.
We heard in testimony that the employer controls the hiring and determines the workplace and could indeed determine that the 70% threshold is never reached. So equating the power of the employer to the union is a spurious argument, inasmuch as the employer has control. Plus, you made reference to the fact that unions took employers, kicking and screaming.... Now if they attempt to represent their workers it's a $50,000 fine, which again undercuts.
I have another question. It seems contradictory that a government that is setting the rules for federally regulated workers is also the same body that will be subjected to those rules. Does that not seem to be a rather contradictory situation? How could it be resolved?