It's one of the reasons that international standards actually require the government to set the example. They're to be the leaders. They're not to be the people following behind. They're to be leaders.
What's most upsetting, actually, is that PSECA is a budget bill. PSECA was there to control the budget. I think Mr. Farrell quite candidly said that employers want to control their budgets, right? Getting it into collective bargaining is a way in which they could try to control it, and then, if you don't get what you want, you can strike, but the opposite is supposed to be case. From the point of view of the government, it's to take the lead, and under international obligations it is certainly supposed to ensure that its own employees--which is what it's doing here with PSECA, because PSECA covers the people that it funds and employs--