I will answer your first question.
We recognize the importance of unpaid work, for sure. What's more, we have carried out a fairly thorough consultation. The message that we were given was still pretty clear. First, we were told that the data and the subject were very important. There is not the slightest doubt in that respect. However, users from several fields told us quite clearly that the data from the General Social Survey was most certainly the source of information that allowed them to do the studies and the work they needed to do.
As for the chronological series, we measured unpaid work a number of times as part of the General Social Survey. We still have a chronological series over a number of years that allows us—and users—to conduct the necessary studies.